Trump has vowed to sign bill to eliminate Obama-era mandate to disclose on-site traumata and fatalities, which occur at a high rate in chicken-processing industry
The Trump administration and Senate Republicans rolled back labor protection statutes on Monday in a pair of moves that labor advocates predict will chill complaints by vulnerable employees, especially in the low-wage food processing industry, which relies heavily on easily exploited undocumented laborers.
The Senate voted along party line, 49 -4 8, to repeal an Obama-era executive order mandating accurate labor violation record-keeping, meaning that companies with on-the-job accidents and fatalities no longer have to disclose that information in order to receive lucrative government contracts. Earlier the same day, Trump issued an executive order promising to rigorously assess all grounds of inadmissibility or deportability with respect to foreign nationals on US soil.
The House already voted to pass the bill revoking the record-keeping order; Trump has said he will sign it into law. Some 134 public interest groups, from the ACLU to the Sierra Club, signed a petition to Senate majority leader Mitch McConnell asking the Senate to keep the disclosure law as is.McConnell, with his fellow Republican, voted to repeal it.
Debbie Berkowitz, formerly a senior official with the Obama administrations Office of Safety and Health Administration( Osha ), called Congresss decision to undo Obamas order a major setback for employees. When the order is rescinded by Congress, it cannot be reissued by another president.
She said one of the industries most likely to experience the impact of the repeal is the poultry industry, an industry with high rate of worker injury and death, large government contracts, and an historic reliance on undocumented employees.
Berkowitz told the Guardian she believed the chicken-processing industry targets recent refugees and undocumented immigrants for employment because they are less likely to complain. Under Trump, she said, things will get even worse. The authorities concerned is altogether for corporations and lobbyists and not for the American worker, she said.
There are a lot of good industries out there, Berkowitz said, but she does not believe poultry processing is one of them. You shouldnt be allowed to get away with hiring workers and then terrorizing them to get away with unsafe working conditions. Berkowitz currently works for a non-profit called the National Employment Law Project. This is an industry that purposely locates in areas, in rural out of the route areas where they can hire employees that are newly resettled from other countries.
The poultry industry will also likely benefit from continued exploitation of undocumented workers and trade recent refugees , been pointed out by Oxfam, Human Rights Watch and many others, while undocumented employees themselves continue to live in fear of edicts like Trumps executive order, she said. Workers are already scared to talk to Osha; they definitely wont talk to Osha now, said Berkowitz, who worked as chief of staff and later senior policy analyst with Osha from 2009 to 2015.
There are reasons for that high level of mistrust: under George W Bush, Immigration and Customs Enforcement( Ice) agents impersonated Osha inspectors in order to gain access to facilities where undocumented immigrants were employed.
The specter of a 2008 raid on a Postville, Iowa poultry processors looms large over any worker afraid of being separated from family and community over immigration status. Workers at the Postville AgriProcessors chicken processing facility asked Ice to forego any planned enforcement actions while they unionized. Instead, Ice arrested 600 people and tried 300 of them in four days in an ad hoc courtroom set up at a local fairground, where they were sentenced five at a time.
While some have criticized Obamas record on expulsions, Berkowitz said under Bush it was even worse. Theres a fear that things will get worse[ again ], Berkowitz said. Theres going to be cutbacks on enforcement by worker protection bureaux that say, Youve got to comply with the law.
Worker protections save taxpayer fund, said Berkowitz and too often, the plight of the animals being processed receives closer attention than the treatment of the people processing them: Consumers care about whether its organic, whether its free-range, whether its humanely created, but what about the nations men and women who faculty the plants? Do they care if theyre humanely treated? Its not just being nice. A lot of these people are on social assistance benefits because its a very low-wage job, so the taxpayer subsidizes the industry.